Tony Lambert wrote:
You hit it right on the head(!) I was at the Metrolinx round table meeting recently with Chair Carr, and Councillors Best and Cluett. At the meeting it was discussed the scope of the work involved, as well as the billions it will cost. Yes, the province is mired in deficits until 2017 (hopefully ending by then they say), but my question is this for the province: "Why require Milton grow by 100,000 people in a little over 10 years if you (the province) do not have the money to support our growth?"
Let's face the truth, and let common sense prevail. If you the province do not have the money to support growth, to not make growth inconvenience my constituents, then perhaps we should alter the Places To Grow Act (2005) so Milton can say NO to growth.
Best Regards,
Tony
Tony Lambert
Town & Regional Councillor
Wards 1,6,7 and 8
http://www.tony-lambert.caTony
As I understand it the purpose of the round table was to begin the conversation as to how to pay for "The Big Move" and yet nowhere in this thread or the other threads on the topic have I seen any suggestions as to how the $30billion shortfall that is required to deliver the plans in their current form. Let's not forget that this plan is not new it was originally delivered to the Minister in late 2008 over 4 years ago. I quote from the Big Move website: -
"On November 28, 2008, the Metrolinx Board of Directors voted unanimously to adopt this Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), which we have named The Big Move: Transforming Transportation in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (GTHA). The Big Move is a landmark achievement. The municipal leaders on the Metrolinx Board have come together, with a single voice, to create a common vision for transportation in the region."
I realise it is important that Milton needs be at least addressed in the plan even though it is at this late stage but surely in a $50 billion plan that could be termed as tinkering round the edges of the big picture important as it is to us Miltonians. Perhaps it would help us further our own cause if we not only pointed out the shortfalls but also entered the debate on how to fund the entire Plan including our community needs.
Sure you can play politics and agree with Sandeep that we should stop growth but if we don't find a way to fund the $30 billion it will be a disaster whatever we do locally.
On a side note I find it strange that Milton's needs where ignored as I believe a previous early chair of Metrolinx was a former Mayor of Burlington and therefore a former member of Halton Regional Council.
I would be very interested in hearing your views and those of the other Councillors in how we can fund this $30 billion shortfall without adding to the Provincial deficit.
Regards
Martin