HawthorneVillager.com

Hawthorne Village (Milton) Discussion Board
It is currently Thu May 28, 2026 1:22 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 945 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jul 17, 2015 12:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 8:12 am
Posts: 4609
I’d be happy if Mattamy would simply disclose that they have half assed quality control and your home is almost certain to be short on insulation and missing shingles.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 17, 2015 12:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2013 2:59 pm
Posts: 27
prickly_pete wrote:
mortimer1010 wrote:
GreenJP has responded to some of my posts in a hostile manner which was totally unnecessary and you stick up for him. I get it. Old boy's club perhaps?


Oh, totally. In fact, GreenJP and I have a stonemason's meeting on Monday where we will plan out the next phase of Operation:Tiehack furthering our quest for total Halton domination. Illuminati and such. See you Monday, GreenJP - or should I say, "Worshipful Master."

Glad you are having fun with this. We could all use a laugh right about now.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 17, 2015 12:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2015 2:46 pm
Posts: 47
kf095 wrote:
mortimer1010 wrote:
Yes, we all know, people love to buy houses especially new ones, in the GTA. However, if I walk into a sales office, look at the site plan and see that the houses are near a major highway, at least I know up front I will be living near a major highway and I have can decide for myself if this is something I can tolerate or not! See the difference here?

No difference. At all.
As long as you know what site plans in the sales offices are never showing you accurate information about surroundings. N E V E R.

I have no sympathy for house flippers in general, but if someone buys house for actual living in it...

How about common sense? This developing site is in the middle of the fields. Doesn't it rights the bell?
It is GTA where if place is empty anything could happened to it. But nothing unexpected most of the times.
Same for this particular place. Instead of looking at site plan (not surroundings survey) just drive where.
I would turn off right away as soon as I'll see how close the regional dump is. And Milton has developing plans available for public.
I knew this terminal is coming to this area since we moved to Milton.

Can you tell me why the dump is mentioned on the sales agreement, but the intermodal is not? Now, I don't know if the intermodal is mentioned on sales agreements now that CN made an official announcement in March 2015. I have no idea if Ontario builders even have to disclose that type of information on the sales agreement. I believe in the U.S. they do. I wonder if anyone on here knows?


Last edited by mortimer1010 on Fri Jul 17, 2015 12:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 17, 2015 12:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2015 2:46 pm
Posts: 47
bremer wrote:
I’d be happy if Mattamy would simply disclose that they have half assed quality control and your home is almost certain to be short on insulation and missing shingles.

Yikes.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 17, 2015 1:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 11:45 am
Posts: 244
I only seek to have the names of the individuals with the prior knowledge made public for the purpose of knowing who you are dealing with. This is not to extract a pound of flesh for myself, nope, I am for the CN intermodal terminal, stated that early on in this thread. I am mad that a group of elected officials with prior knowledge, stayed quiet about this until the official gag order was placed – convenient. However if the names provided, give help to those affected with an avenue to extract their pound of flesh, then go for it.

So why did they stay quiet?

Could any of these individuals profit from withholding this information, could this group have allowed a business or businesses to profit by not allowing the public to know? These individuals are elected by the people from this area and region not elected by the businesses they could possibly be protecting. This group that keep quiet by not allowing this information to be leaked, allowed people to make decisions to buy homes near that area. Anyone new to this area prior to the announcement would not have known a CN Terminal is planned and it would not show up on any area plans as a terminal. For those that now know there will be a CN terminal and it does not bother them, okay. However there is also a group that it does bother, with the possible angst or fear of not knowing how it could impact them. Since the CN announcement, some local politicians are not making those feeling the angst any happier with some of their predictions. You can say buyer beware but in this case it would have been nearly impossible for a potential buyer to know what was being built there. Again by holding back information to the public, this group affected many lives and families possibly. They did not asked to be put in that situation and especially if they knew it before hand this could have been a different matter for them.

Recently, in case anyone missed it, one elected politician – Colin Best, at a boy ! , did try to put forth a motion to notify potential buyers of the CN Intermodal hub but was shot down by Mayor Krantz. Mayor Krantz was worried more about the local builders filing suit for lost sales against the town than future citizens. Colin seems to be one of our true local hero’s here, wish he would run for mayor.

The only elected official to date, to state they had prior knowledge of this matter when asked is, the Honourable Lisa Raitt. The others hide behind her dress.

opie


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 17, 2015 2:26 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 8:12 am
Posts: 4609
Well, in the Mayors defense, he is right to be concerned about lawsuits seeing that he and the town are being sued for canceling a development deal improperly. That one’s going to be quietly settled with a non-disclosure agreement attached to it I guarantee.

As for who knew what when, we pretty much know. Krantz and Carr both knew. Most likely, nobody below them did as evidenced by Zeesh’s surprise at learning of this. I’m sure some town/regional employees also knew, but they aren’t elected.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 17, 2015 2:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2013 2:59 pm
Posts: 27
opie wrote:

The only elected official to date, to state they had prior knowledge of this matter when asked is, the Honourable Lisa Raitt. The others hide behind her dress.

opie


So you're saying it's been known about by certain parties for quite some time but was kept from the general public?

And also kept from buyers who bought in the area even though it was known before selling started?

Do you think the builders knew about it before sales started?

Interesting about the motion Colin put forward, but surely now any builder would have to list this in its warning clauses now that it is public knowledge no?

Interestingly on Halton's web site devoted to information about this project it even says in the key dates that CN first shared its intent with them to proceed with the project in January so at the very least the region knew then. Funny enough this would have been about the same time sales for the area started but nobody said anything until the "official" announcement in mid-March.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 17, 2015 2:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 3:39 pm
Posts: 3309
Location: phase 11
Finally... a few people are starting to understand the real issue and ask the right questions.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 17, 2015 3:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2015 2:46 pm
Posts: 47
martin prince wrote:
Finally... a few people are starting to understand the real issue and ask the right questions.

Correct me if I am wrong, but the region and town make a lot of money from development charges from the builder so they would want those home sold as well.

I guess the question is, did the region inform the builder of CN's intentions in January of 2015? If they did, is the builder required by law, to disclose this information to the purchaser on it's sales agreement?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 17, 2015 3:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 8:12 am
Posts: 4609
CN doesn’t need to pay development charges because the town/region doesn’t have to develop anything to support the facility. So it’s not lost money.

You could argue some money is needed to expand roads, but in the grand scheme of things it’s not significant. I imagine CN would gladly pay a few mill to support those costs if our elected officials would get on board and support the project rather then grandstand for voters.

I tend to take the simplistic view on these things. There’s no corruption or conspiracy to cash in by anyone here. Carr and Krantz wanted this kept quiet solely so they could get elected again. That’s as deep as this goes. Show me evidence otherwise and I’ll change my tune.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 17, 2015 4:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 3:39 pm
Posts: 3309
Location: phase 11
bremer wrote:
I tend to take the simplistic view on these things. There’s no corruption or conspiracy to cash in by anyone here. Carr and Krantz wanted this kept quiet solely so they could get elected again. That’s as deep as this goes. Show me evidence otherwise and I’ll change my tune.


I don't know if you have the names right, but tilting the election is the speculative ballpark I'm sitting in as well.

It may be bigger than that, but so far the little slips that have come out here have only indicated delaying the info for that purpose.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 17, 2015 4:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2015 2:46 pm
Posts: 47
bremer wrote:
CN doesn’t need to pay development charges because the town/region doesn’t have to develop anything to support the facility. So it’s not lost money.

You could argue some money is needed to expand roads, but in the grand scheme of things it’s not significant. I imagine CN would gladly pay a few mill to support those costs if our elected officials would get on board and support the project rather then grandstand for voters.

I tend to take the simplistic view on these things. There’s no corruption or conspiracy to cash in by anyone here. Carr and Krantz wanted this kept quiet solely so they could get elected again. That’s as deep as this goes. Show me evidence otherwise and I’ll change my tune.

Bremer, I was referring to the development charges that the town and region collect from the builder for the subdivision. I would think that is a significant amount of money.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 17, 2015 5:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 07, 2015 2:46 pm
Posts: 47
cactus_jack wrote:
mortimer1010 wrote:
martin prince wrote:
Finally... a few people are starting to understand the real issue and ask the right questions.

Correct me if I am wrong, but the region and town make a lot of money from development charges from the builder so they would want those home sold as well.

I guess the question is, did the region inform the builder of CN's intentions in January of 2015? If they did, is the builder required by law, to disclose this information to the purchaser on it's sales agreement?


Just one, Martin!

IP address information
Other users posting from this IP
Slip Digby [ 7 Posts ]

Are you saying you have not seen other people posting on this topic?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 17, 2015 6:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 02, 2013 2:59 pm
Posts: 27
Or not.


Last edited by Slip Digby on Tue Nov 03, 2015 3:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri Jul 17, 2015 11:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 10:02 pm
Posts: 993
mortimer1010 wrote:
Can you tell me why the dump is mentioned on the sales agreement, but the intermodal is not? Now, I don't know if the intermodal is mentioned on sales agreements now that CN made an official announcement in March 2015. I have no idea if Ontario builders even have to disclose that type of information on the sales agreement. I believe in the U.S. they do. I wonder if anyone on here knows?


Well even Town of Milton very clearly states to find out what is around you before you buy
It is the first bullet point on their brochure which has been in circulation since at least 2013
They also say to call the town at provided number if builder does not tell you
So I assume you did some basic due diligence before ranting online?

https://www.milton.ca/en/live/resources ... 2_2014.pdf

_________________
There is no reasoning with Tru-Anon people, it really is cult-like


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 945 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.029s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]