HawthorneVillager.com

Hawthorne Village (Milton) Discussion Board
It is currently Tue Jun 09, 2026 7:36 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 259 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 18  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 8:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 3:17 pm
Posts: 3525
frankp wrote:
freemantrailfamily wrote:
Who's your councillor frankp?


Arnold Huffman


Oh. Councillor Piano Stairs. My sympathies.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 10:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 635
Location: Milton
Reading this, and the material on Mike's website I kind of agree with deferring it to the next council. It gives you guys some more incentive to work hard for it... get re-elected and then have the reward. I don't think you can completely remove yourselves from the process unless you look at a formula that automatically gives a raise every year indexed say to inflation or something; if that's even possible.

You can give raises to tempt me, but it isn't going to work :wink: However, if you want trim the raise and throw in some health benefits, then I might have to reconsider.

_________________
Follow me on Twitter: @miltonlaura
Check out my blog: http://www.miltonviews.wordpress.com
website: www.laurarsteiner.com


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 12:04 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 3:17 pm
Posts: 3525
munchito wrote:
you really have it out for this guy, eh?


Just to go back to this for a second, Munchito - refreshing my memory on what the term "have it in for someone" means, I really do not "have it in" for Tony. To say that would imply I mean harm to come to him. I do not. Outside council I feel bad for the guy and hope he's able to put his life together I really do. Everyone deserves that. Everyone. He deserves it, his family deserves it, his friends deserve it.

My issue with Tony has always been his ability to represent Milton competently on Regional issues (road and urban planning at the regional level, regional social services including policing, ambulance services, local health program development and delivery, social assistance and social programming, water and waste management, agriculture, regional and inter-regional transportation and co-operation), and Local issues (local development, planning and maintenance, community services delivery and development, local transit, local economic development,fire services) . There's a lot more to it than attending the occasional function for 10 minutes, shake hands and leave, poking regional staff about light timing on regional roads, making the occasional paragraph post here, and sticking your hand up to vote on agenda items at council and standing committee meetings. The only issue with the DUI debacle that stuck with me in terms of his councillor ability was the accompanying lying and misrepresentation of facts. That's hardly a way to build trust when you already don't really trust a person. I was never a fan politically of Rick Day either, another nice guy outside of council from what I've been told. Tony reminds me a lot of Rick in his political life (the later years anyways). Just not up for the job he's been elected to.

Now back on the salary issue: no-one said boo when in December Regional Council voted themselves a 3.2% pay increase for 2012. That's 44K to 47K for Tony, Colin and the Mayor (our three regional council representatives) and the other 18 members of Regional Council. To be fair I think Colin works his tail off and deserves it, and Gord Krantz too when you actually watch him run a council meeting and the questions he asks. He clearly understands the big picture. I just don't see it in Tony unfortunately and we're two years in already. I find it very inconsistent for a councillor to accept a 3.2% increase on their regional council salary (and the one that's approximately 75% higher than the municipal salary), then 6 months later decide to decline (after voting FOR the motion the day before) a similar sized increase for 3 years on the much smaller local council salary.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 12:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2012 5:53 pm
Posts: 150
freemantrailfamily wrote:
Just to go back to this for a second, Munchito - refreshing my memory on what the term "have it in for someone" means, I really do not "have it in" for Tony. To say that would imply I mean harm to come to him. I do not. Outside council I feel bad for the guy and hope he's able to put his life together I really do. Everyone deserves that. Everyone. He deserves it, his family deserves it, his friends deserve it.

My issue with Tony has always been his ability to represent Milton competently on Regional issues (road and urban planning at the regional level, regional social services including policing, ambulance services, local health program development and delivery, social assistance and social programming, water and waste management, agriculture, regional and inter-regional transportation and co-operation), and Local issues (local development, planning and maintenance, community services delivery and development, local transit, local economic development,fire services) . There's a lot more to it than attending the occasional function for 10 minutes, shake hands and leave, poking regional staff about light timing on regional roads, making the occasional paragraph post here, and sticking your hand up to vote on agenda items at council and standing committee meetings. The only issue with the DUI debacle that stuck with me in terms of his councillor ability was the accompanying lying and misrepresentation of facts. That's hardly a way to build trust when you already don't really trust a person. I was never a fan politically of Rick Day either, another nice guy outside of council from what I've been told. Tony reminds me a lot of Rick in his political life (the later years anyways). Just not up for the job he's been elected to.
Now back on the salary issue: no-one said boo when in December Regional Council voted themselves a 3.2% pay increase for 2012. That's 44K to 47K for Tony, Colin and the Mayor (our three regional council representatives) and the other 18 members of Regional Council. To be fair I think Colin works his tail off and deserves it, and Gord Krantz too when you actually watch him run a council meeting and the questions he asks. He clearly understands the big picture. I just don't see it in Tony unfortunately and we're two years in already. I find it very inconsistent for a councillor to accept a 3.2% increase on their regional council salary (and the one that's approximately 75% higher than the municipal salary), then 6 months later decide to decline (after voting FOR the motion the day before) a similar sized increase for 3 years on the much smaller local council salary.


Was this your expression as you typed that?
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 12:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2010 3:17 pm
Posts: 3525
No, don't think so. What is that?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 6:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 11:25 am
Posts: 108
cactus_jack wrote:
So you're saying either:
You weren't aware of the salary before you ran.
You weren't aware of the job requirements.
You are doing such a great job that you are worth more and we should pay you so you don't quit.
We should increase the pay to entice the right people to run. This infers that you aren't the right person, and we need someone new.

If money isn't an issue, and you're doing this for the love of the community, then you don't really need a raise ever, do you? Since the default response whenever we complain about something is "property taxes in Milton are too low, too bad", I will say this to you all getting a raise: "property taxes in Milton are too low, too bad."

But honestly I say screw it. Take as much as you can while Milton goes to the shitter. I really don't give a rats ass anymore. Funny how we're not allowed to compare Milton against other municipalities for services and appearance, but it's okay when it comes to Councilor salaries.

Now if you'll excuse me I have some red lights to sit through.


I couldn't have said it any better. You would think a math major would get it, but no.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 7:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 9:02 am
Posts: 2720
freemantrailfamily wrote:
munchito wrote:
you really have it out for this guy, eh?


My issue with Tony has always been his ability to represent Milton competently on Regional issues...<clipped for tidyness>


In no way did I mean to imply that you wish harm on him so I hope you don't take it that way. It was just an casual observation after reading through these threads over time.

I'm sure most (if not all) people on here feel the same way you do. Where we stand now, there really are no expectations for him to accomplish anything in his position. We just gotta cut our losses and hold out for another 2 years. While Tony bashing has evolved into a sport on these forums and is occassionally amusing, its almost like picking on the retarded kid in school at this point.

Having said that, count me in to help fight the good fight next campaign season, getting the word out to the masses that don't follow this board (assuming he is brazen enough to try and run again).


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 7:40 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 9:02 am
Posts: 2720
cactus_jack wrote:
Funny how we're not allowed to compare Milton against other municipalities for services and appearance, but it's okay when it comes to Councilor salaries.


+1


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 7:47 am 
munchito wrote:

While Tony bashing has evolved into a sport on these forums and is occassionally amusing, its almost like picking on the retarded kid in school at this point.


This is the exact way I feel about him. I know that I regularly get on the Tony bashing bandwagon and at times I feel a tad guilty for it. Never really could figure out what was the reason until I read this. But I am still motivated to keep on the things he says, why? Because the retarded kid in the classroom, besides not being able to colour within the lines, doesn't really cause any problems. Now I am not Tony is a problem starter, but he sure doesn't fix any of them either.


Top
  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:21 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 9:49 am
Posts: 1268
Location: HVE
munchito wrote:
cactus_jack wrote:
Funny how we're not allowed to compare Milton against other municipalities for services and appearance, but it's okay when it comes to Councilor salaries.


+1



Very good point, CJ... +1 here too.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:25 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 9:49 am
Posts: 1268
Location: HVE
Tony Lambert wrote:
... Please Mike do not take credit for my personal decision...


Yeah, Mike, weren't you aware that we already have someone on the boards in charge of taking credit for other people's efforts? We can't have just anybody do it. :roll:


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:30 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 515
Quote:
So you're saying either:
You weren't aware of the salary before you ran.
You weren't aware of the job requirements.
You are doing such a great job that you are worth more and we should pay you so you don't quit.
We should increase the pay to entice the right people to run. This infers that you aren't the right person, and we need someone new.

If money isn't an issue, and you're doing this for the love of the community, then you don't really need a raise ever, do you? Since the default response whenever we complain about something is "property taxes in Milton are too low, too bad", I will say this to you all getting a raise: "property taxes in Milton are too low, too bad."

But honestly I say screw it. Take as much as you can while Milton goes to the shitter. I really don't give a rats ass anymore. Funny how we're not allowed to compare Milton against other municipalities for services and appearance, but it's okay when it comes to Councilor salaries.

Now if you'll excuse me I have some red lights to sit through.


Well done, sir. [insert slow clap here]


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2005 3:39 pm
Posts: 3309
Location: phase 11
Steve Heath wrote:
munchito wrote:
cactus_jack wrote:
Funny how we're not allowed to compare Milton against other municipalities for services and appearance, but it's okay when it comes to Councilor salaries.


+1



Very good point, CJ... +1 here too.


You guys are going to convince me to change my mind.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 10:21 am
Posts: 4035
cactus_jack wrote:
Zeeshan Hamid wrote:

I encourage you to spend some time actually learning about the amount of effort the role takes. Actually see a council meeting or two, just see amount of reports and research that we have to read and number of evenings and weekends we spend on the job. People are in the council either as a stepping stone to something bigger politically (minority) or because they truly want to make a difference (majority of us). If you honestly think $32,000 / year in 2014 will encourage people to do this for money then I don't really know what to say. If this was about money then I could make significantly more money putting in less hours in a part-time job in my profession.


So you're saying either:
You weren't aware of the salary before you ran.
You weren't aware of the job requirements.
You are doing such a great job that you are worth more and we should pay you so you don't quit.
We should increase the pay to entice the right people to run. This infers that you aren't the right person, and we need someone new.

If money isn't an issue, and you're doing this for the love of the community, then you don't really need a raise ever, do you? Since the default response whenever we complain about something is "property taxes in Milton are too low, too bad", I will say this to you all getting a raise: "property taxes in Milton are too low, too bad."

But honestly I say screw it. Take as much as you can while Milton goes to the shitter. I really don't give a rats ass anymore. Funny how we're not allowed to compare Milton against other municipalities for services and appearance, but it's okay when it comes to Councilor salaries.

Now if you'll excuse me I have some red lights to sit through.


amazing post, my thoughts to a tee.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Wed Jun 27, 2012 8:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 8:24 pm
Posts: 264
RichardTNC wrote:
cactus_jack wrote:
Zeeshan Hamid wrote:

I encourage you to spend some time actually learning about the amount of effort the role takes. Actually see a council meeting or two, just see amount of reports and research that we have to read and number of evenings and weekends we spend on the job. People are in the council either as a stepping stone to something bigger politically (minority) or because they truly want to make a difference (majority of us). If you honestly think $32,000 / year in 2014 will encourage people to do this for money then I don't really know what to say. If this was about money then I could make significantly more money putting in less hours in a part-time job in my profession.


So you're saying either:
You weren't aware of the salary before you ran.
You weren't aware of the job requirements.
You are doing such a great job that you are worth more and we should pay you so you don't quit.
We should increase the pay to entice the right people to run. This infers that you aren't the right person, and we need someone new.

If money isn't an issue, and you're doing this for the love of the community, then you don't really need a raise ever, do you? Since the default response whenever we complain about something is "property taxes in Milton are too low, too bad", I will say this to you all getting a raise: "property taxes in Milton are too low, too bad."

But honestly I say screw it. Take as much as you can while Milton goes to the shitter. I really don't give a rats ass anymore. Funny how we're not allowed to compare Milton against other municipalities for services and appearance, but it's okay when it comes to Councilor salaries.

Now if you'll excuse me I have some red lights to sit through.


amazing post, my thoughts to a tee.


+1...mine as well. Seriously Rick M is the councilor on this board I respect.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 259 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 18  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.034s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]