HawthorneVillager.com

Hawthorne Village (Milton) Discussion Board
It is currently Tue Jun 09, 2026 3:49 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 184 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2013 11:42 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 1:06 am
Posts: 577
Location: Fifth Line (at Derry)
Tony Lambert wrote:
Hi Everybody,

Today at regional council, we discussed Halton Region's position regarding advocacy with the province of Ontario, which can be read here http://webaps.halton.ca/news/mediashow. ... 9-12-05-42 Part of the Regional Councillors', and my main focus in advocating for my constituents is changing the Province's view of Milton regarding the BIG MOVE. As you may know, the province promised me and the other Regional Councillors 2 way all day train service to Milton and Georgetown, and a Milton East GO station at Trafalgar and Derry within the next 16 years. Well, the province has now changed their mind, and said no, we (Milton) are NOT getting those 2 things (all day trains & a 2nd GO station) in the next 16 years. This folks is catastrophic for you and I. What I mean by it's a disaster is we will be larger than Oakville or Burlington in about 7 years because the province forces us to grow by 8,000 people per year (mostly in my 4 wards), yet, we will not have what Oakville and Burlington have which is - all day 2 way train service AND a second GO station. We are facing brutal, unimaginable grid-lock my friends if this happens. I'm talking Derry road of 10 years ago - again! That does not include Britannia which would be worse. This is totally, completely unacceptable to me. Thank God, and I really mean thank God the other Regional Councillors have sided with me on this, banded together, and are going to stand up and fight for you. I have sent letters to the Premier, I have and will speak until we get this, yes, it's totally on with the province for me. I cannot let this happen. Thank you Regional Councillors for the unanimous vote and message we are sending the Province, to change your mind. Or, we (the Regional Councillors) will bring pressure to bear by shutting development down. Which is cool by me (and we are in the process of doing it as I type this) if the province will not keep their promises to me and my constituents to be fair and our partners in growth.


Ciao,
Tony

Tony Lambert
Town & Regional Councillor
Wards 1,6,7 and 8
http://www.tony-lambert.ca


Tony

The one comment from the report that absolutely staggered me was that after the plan was fully implemented that the average commute would be reduced by only 5 minutes! I assume to get to that number a cost/benefit analysis was carried out project by project and it is possible that the two Milton projects did not make the cut based on a cost benefit analysis. It strikes me that the best way of reversing the Metrolinx decision on the Milton projects is for the Halton Region to submit its own cost/benefit analysis.

I think Laura Steiner earlier in this thread talked of the cost in quantifiable terms but nowhere do I see any reference to the potential benefit other than general comments on "disaster", "catastrophic" and "brutal, unimaginable gridlock". Has Regional Staff actually done its own cost/benefit analysis and if so what is the impact on the average commute? If this has not been done do you not think it is well worth doing such an exercise - it can only add strength to the Council advocacy - assuming of course there actually is a benefit!.

Martin

_________________
Martin Capper

HVRA member

www.cappercares.ca
www.MartinCapper.com


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2013 12:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 5:52 pm
Posts: 925
bremer wrote:
Tony,

OK, so Brittania will begin next year. I’m glad to hear it. But even with that complete, I doubt we’ll get the relief we need.

What about Steeles? Why can’t we get that done now as well?

And if the provincial laws are tying your hands, then shouldn’t you be lobbying to have those laws changed? It’s seems silly that we can’t expand a road unless we build homes to go with it.


Hi bremer,

Here's the schedule for Steeles Ave. widening which is underway:

4-Lane widening from James Snow Parkway to Trafalgar - Start - March 2012 Completion Date Summer 2015

4-Lane widening from Trafalgar to Winston Churchill - Start Spring 2012 Completion Date Summer 2015

4 Lane widening from Industrial Dr. to Martin St. Start - Fall 2016 Completion Date Fall 2018

Halton region staff and councillors are lobbying the province to change the laws that determine development.


Thank You,
Tony

Tony Lambert
Town & Regional Councillor
Wards 1,6,7 and 8
www.tony-lambert.ca


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2013 12:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 5:52 pm
Posts: 925
Martin Capper wrote:

Tony

The one comment from the report that absolutely staggered me was that after the plan was fully implemented that the average commute would be reduced by only 5 minutes! I assume to get to that number a cost/benefit analysis was carried out project by project and it is possible that the two Milton projects did not make the cut based on a cost benefit analysis. It strikes me that the best way of reversing the Metrolinx decision on the Milton projects is for the Halton Region to submit its own cost/benefit analysis.

I think Laura Steiner earlier in this thread talked of the cost in quantifiable terms but nowhere do I see any reference to the potential benefit other than general comments on "disaster", "catastrophic" and "brutal, unimaginable gridlock". Has Regional Staff actually done its own cost/benefit analysis and if so what is the impact on the average commute? If this has not been done do you not think it is well worth doing such an exercise - it can only add strength to the Council advocacy - assuming of course there actually is a benefit!.

Martin


Hi Martin,

Where does it say 5 minutes? I'll get clarification. The goal of the BIG MOVE, which regional council relied on when we devised and approved the Halton Region Transportation Masterplan, (which led to us approving more than 100,000 people to move to Milton), was that the BIG MOVE would have commute times the same as 2008. It's what the province promised us. This obviously is even less quality, or more time required to commute, but hey, we can perhaps live with 2008 commute times to get to our jobs.

But with the province now saying we will not get transportation options to even keep 2008 levels, until at least 17 years from now, while at the same time add more than 100,000 people because of the province's Places To Grow Act (2005), before my constituents get transportation infrastructure (relief) from the province is truly, truly catastrophic. It will take years to even plan, design and build a 2nd GO station. As well, getting all day train service will take time to coordinate. So, even if the province says in 17 years, we'll review your situation Milton, (and we the province have the money in 17 years) we may have to wait until 20 years from now to see the all day trains and a GO station(!) But we would be 200,000 people on our regional roads which will be at over capacity. It's unbelievable unacceptable and untenable. No way man. I'm going to advocate very strongly until the government reverses this decision to not assist Milton, while at the same time force us to take another 100,000 residents. No way.


Best Regards,
Tony

Tony Lambert
Town & Regional Councillor
Wards 1,6,7 and 8
http://www.tony-lambert.ca


Last edited by Tony Lambert on Thu May 30, 2013 1:04 pm, edited 5 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2013 12:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 6:35 pm
Posts: 627
Martin Capper wrote:
Tony

The one comment from the report that absolutely staggered me was that after the plan was fully implemented that the average commute would be reduced by only 5 minutes! I assume to get to that number a cost/benefit analysis was carried out project by project and it is possible that the two Milton projects did not make the cut based on a cost benefit analysis. It strikes me that the best way of reversing the Metrolinx decision on the Milton projects is for the Halton Region to submit its own cost/benefit analysis.

I think Laura Steiner earlier in this thread talked of the cost in quantifiable terms but nowhere do I see any reference to the potential benefit other than general comments on "disaster", "catastrophic" and "brutal, unimaginable gridlock". Has Regional Staff actually done its own cost/benefit analysis and if so what is the impact on the average commute? If this has not been done do you not think it is well worth doing such an exercise - it can only add strength to the Council advocacy - assuming of course there actually is a benefit!.

Martin

They don't like to talk about this, but the Big Move isn't really about reducing commute times, it's about preventing it from getting even worse. If we really got serious about addressing congestion, we would need a $100 Billion plan (probably much more actually), not a $50 Billion plan, but the province knows they will have a very tough time getting people to agree to the new taxes needed to fund the $50 Billion plan. The problem is that we are playing catchup for a lack of transit investment for the last 30 years.

A big part of the problem though is the mindset of people who rather than accepting a job that pays slightly less, and living in a house slightly smaller, such that they can live near their work; we have way too many people commuting stupid long distances (Barrie to Mississauga, St. Catharines to Toronto, Burlington to Markham), resulting in massive traffic congestion. If all those people had reasonable commute lengths that would solve the whole problem right there. And yes I know people with those exact commutes, and know that there are many more just like them. In theory you would think the crazy congestion would make people accept this reality and not work and live so far apart, but it seems people just leave at 6 am instead. Crazy the amount of people who leave home at 6 am, and don't get home until 8 pm. Not much of a life if you ask me, but as long as you have the big house with fancy cars I guess it doesn't matter.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2013 12:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 8:12 am
Posts: 4609
No kidding. Well, for a guy who thinks he knows whats going on around this town, I had no idea Steeles was being widened as we speak. I’ll shut up now.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2013 1:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 6:35 pm
Posts: 627
bremer wrote:
OK, so Brittania will begin next year. I’m glad to hear it. But even with that complete, I doubt we’ll get the relief we need.

Umm nope. It was supposed to start this year, but problems with the EA resulted in a delay to next year, but then the region decided they didn't want any construction on routes to the velodrome during the Pan-Am games, and so they have postponed the start of this project until Fall 2015 (which will probably become Spring 2016) such that there is no impact on Pan-Am traffic. This information was given by regional staff at the Tremaine widening PIC in March.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2013 1:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 5:52 pm
Posts: 925
btimmis wrote:
bremer wrote:
OK, so Brittania will begin next year. I’m glad to hear it. But even with that complete, I doubt we’ll get the relief we need.

Umm nope. It was supposed to start this year, but problems with the EA resulted in a delay to next year, but then the region decided they didn't want any construction on routes to the velodrome during the Pan-Am games, and so they have postponed the start of this project until Fall 2015 (which will probably become Spring 2016) such that there is no impact on Pan-Am traffic. This information was given by regional staff at the Tremaine widening PIC in March.



That's incorrect. Britannia widening starts next year (Fall), assuming we get a deal with the developers regarding the next allocation. Milton's Regional Councillors (Mayor Krantz Regional Councillor Best and myself) were briefed of this timeline in a meeting with staff a few weeks ago, because it's very important to the 3 of us. I also get confirmations of this from staff every few weeks. If you have proof of otherwise btimmis, please post it here.

If the timeline changes for any reason, I will let everyone know. But as of now, it is Fall 2014 for Britannia road widening to commence.


Thank You,
Tony

Tony Lambert
Town & Regional Councillor
Wards 1,6,7 and 8
http://www.tony-lambert.ca


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2013 1:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 1:06 am
Posts: 577
Location: Fifth Line (at Derry)
btimmis wrote:
They don't like to talk about this, but the Big Move isn't really about reducing commute times, it's about preventing it from getting even worse. If we really got serious about addressing congestion, we would need a $100 Billion plan (probably much more actually), not a $50 Billion plan, but the province knows they will have a very tough time getting people to agree to the new taxes needed to fund the $50 Billion plan. The problem is that we are playing catchup for a lack of transit investment for the last 30 years.




OK I'll buy that but I still ask the question which Tony hasn't answered other than with meaningless generalities - Have the Regional Staff performed their own analysis as to the impact of postponing all day Go service and the second Milton GO station. Presumably the impact can be assessed as either change in average commute time or change in vehicles/hour on major corridors? It seems to me that would be an important factor in any advocacy campaign to the Province!

Martin

_________________
Martin Capper

HVRA member

www.cappercares.ca
www.MartinCapper.com


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2013 1:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 1:06 am
Posts: 577
Location: Fifth Line (at Derry)
Tony Lambert wrote:
Where does it say 5 minutes?

Best Regards,
Tony

Tony Lambert
Town & Regional Councillor
Wards 1,6,7 and 8
http://www.tony-lambert.ca


It's been widely reported however you haven't answered my question regarding cost?benefit analysis or in our case impact analysis. Have Regional Staff prepared an impact analysis in measurable terms of the delays in the two Milton projects? Surely such an impact analysis would be a cornerstone of any advocacy campaign?

_________________
Martin Capper

HVRA member

www.cappercares.ca
www.MartinCapper.com


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2013 2:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 5:52 pm
Posts: 925
Martin Capper wrote:
btimmis wrote:
They don't like to talk about this, but the Big Move isn't really about reducing commute times, it's about preventing it from getting even worse. If we really got serious about addressing congestion, we would need a $100 Billion plan (probably much more actually), not a $50 Billion plan, but the province knows they will have a very tough time getting people to agree to the new taxes needed to fund the $50 Billion plan. The problem is that we are playing catchup for a lack of transit investment for the last 30 years.




OK I'll buy that but I still ask the question which Tony hasn't answered other than with meaningless generalities - Have the Regional Staff performed their own analysis as to the impact of postponing all day Go service and the second Milton GO station. Presumably the impact can be assessed as either change in average commute time or change in vehicles/hour on major corridors? It seems to me that would be an important factor in any advocacy campaign to the Province!

Martin



Good point Martin, I'm sure the data is there and I'll get it. But until then, it's still catastrophic!


Salut,
Tony

Tony lambert
Town & Regional Councillor
Wards 1,6,7 and 8
www.tony-lamber.ca


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2013 2:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 5:52 pm
Posts: 925
Martin Capper wrote:
Tony Lambert wrote:
Where does it say 5 minutes?

Best Regards,
Tony

Tony Lambert
Town & Regional Councillor
Wards 1,6,7 and 8
http://www.tony-lambert.ca


It's been widely reported however you haven't answered my question regarding cost?benefit analysis or in our case impact analysis. Have Regional Staff prepared an impact analysis in measurable terms of the delays in the two Milton projects? Surely such an impact analysis would be a cornerstone of any advocacy campaign?



I'll ask Martin.


Thanks,
Tony

Tony Lambert
Town & Regional Councillor
Wards 1,6,7, and 8
www.tony-lambert.ca


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2013 2:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 6:35 pm
Posts: 627
Tony Lambert wrote:
If you have proof of otherwise btimmis, please post it here.

I'll look into this to see if the plans have changed, but this is what I was told by regional staff. If one of you on council has been able to change their minds, then that would be excellent news.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2013 3:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 6:35 pm
Posts: 627
Tony Lambert wrote:
That's incorrect. Britannia widening starts next year (Fall), assuming we get a deal with the developers regarding the next allocation.

And what if we don't get a deal with developers over DC's and growth gets put on hold? Regardless we still need the new road. I strongly support the region's position that growth should pay for itself, but if the DC situation leads to years of OMB wrangling, we can't afford for the project just to sit on hold. I think most residents of Milton agree that while we think DC's should pay for the road, ultimately it needs to happen ASAP, one way or another. I hope that council keeps that in mind that these projects are needed, regardless of how they are funded and that some of these projects (Steeles, 25, Britannia) can't just go on hold because of political issues.

Also, an interesting and related article some of you might find interesting:
http://www.insidehalton.com/news-story/3249841-region-won-t-back-down-on-development-charges-bylaw/


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Thu May 30, 2013 4:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2010 5:52 pm
Posts: 925
Hi btimmis,

I completely agree with you (thanks for posting the article), regarding how important the regional road widening is, (the Britannia road widening is one of my biggest priorities), so I hope we get a deal with the developers, but in the same breath, I and the Regional Councillors must get the best financial arrangement (deal) for our constituents. This deal is multi-year in scope, and has very far reaching consequences in our community for road construction timing , so we/I have to stand our ground.

I firmly believe that growth must pay for itself, and not by Mr./Mrs. taxpayer, or that we should be inconvenienced by the growth. I just don't think that's right, so I will resist it whenever it's a possibility.

I am reposting the article in Today's Champion regarding Halton's Regional Councillors position regarding discussions with developers regarding development charges and future development. http://www.insidehalton.com/news-story/ ... ges-bylaw/

Thank you Chair Carr for your leadership, and thank you all Halton Regional Councillors and staff who are working on this issue. Have a great night.


Kindest Regards,
Tony

Tony Lambert
Town & Regional Councillor
Wards 1,6,7 and 8
http://www.tony-lambert.ca


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
PostPosted: Fri May 31, 2013 8:04 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 4:10 pm
Posts: 813
btimmis wrote:
A big part of the problem though is the mindset of people who rather than accepting a job that pays slightly less, and living in a house slightly smaller, such that they can live near their work; we have way too many people commuting stupid long distances (Barrie to Mississauga, St. Catharines to Toronto, Burlington to Markham), resulting in massive traffic congestion. If all those people had reasonable commute lengths that would solve the whole problem right there. And yes I know people with those exact commutes, and know that there are many more just like them. In theory you would think the crazy congestion would make people accept this reality and not work and live so far apart, but it seems people just leave at 6 am instead. Crazy the amount of people who leave home at 6 am, and don't get home until 8 pm. Not much of a life if you ask me, but as long as you have the big house with fancy cars I guess it doesn't matter.


This isn't a good argument. The commute times in the GTA are not caused by people coming from Barrie or St. Catherines. They care caused by people living in Milton and driving to Mississauga. People living in Brampton and driving to Mississauga. People in Mississauga driving to Etobicoke. People in Ajax driving to Scarborough.

This isn't about long distance commuters. It's about local commuting. A population of 250,000 all hopping in one per car to go to work. Most of the traffic is caused by people driving less than 20km a day. THOSE people need to be provided a better alternative to driving. THEY are the ones needing the rapid, cheap and efficient transit options. It bothers me when people talk about the distance commuters. Have you ever commuted from Barrie?

I moved from Brampton to Simcoe and commute daily to North York. My commute is BEAUT-I-FUL right up the point I hit Rutherford/400. Before that, I can do 160km/h if I wanted to. Traffic flows great. It's not us clogging up the traffic, its the shear volume of people getting onto the 400 at Rutherford, Major Mackenzie, Finch, etc. I usually just get off and then take the 407 since I work in North North York. My commute times (pending accidents or long weekend Fridays) are consistently in the 35-40 minute range. This is a 55km commute.

For your information, I used the 410 in Brampton to head south every day for years. My entire commute now is shorter than just taking the 410 12-km. Likewise, my commute is also shorter than the Milton to Mississauga commute along the 401.

As more and more people move my way, congestion will increase. It's about the sheer population, not distance commuters. They need to bring in better local rapid transit solutions that make it worth while to take transit instead of driving 15-20km a day. We are nowhere near that now. A GO train would add 1 hour to my commute.

_________________

Looking for something to do today?
Day Trips Canada - http://www.day-trips.ca


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 184 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.023s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]