HawthorneVillager.com

Hawthorne Village (Milton) Discussion Board
It is currently Sat Jun 13, 2026 10:04 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1889 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 ... 126  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 3:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 4:10 pm
Posts: 813
Dabills wrote:
I can see both, i dont really see room for sustainable growth. Except for the multi million dollar homes but those dont really matter.

sales were up this month in the GTA though. people are still feeling pretty confident which is good for the overall economy i would say.

And they are not all paid to put something out. Ben Rabidoux is just a regular guy with a blog.


As long as we keep adding more and more people to the region and the unemployment rate doesn't start going up, there will always be sustainable growth. Now if the interest rates, mortgage restrictions and consumer debt reduce come into play, you will see less qualified buyers. This will show in the prices but don't expect a massive drop. You are posting as if the entire GTA is living pay cheque to pay cheque with their credit cards maxed and running to the money mart down the street for cash advances every day while living in a $600,000 home. I don't think this is the case.

Does Ben Rabidoux have advertising on his regular guy blog? If so, that's how he is being paid. If not, kudos.

_________________

Looking for something to do today?
Day Trips Canada - http://www.day-trips.ca


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 03, 2011 4:54 pm 
growth in multi million dollar homes? this is where i shake my head. its small part of the population in multi million dollar homes, when the economy is in the dumps, these are the first homes to get a major beatdown. regualr homes in the 500k suffer, albeit not like the larger, expensive homes. believe me im speaking from direct experience.


Top
  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 04, 2011 7:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 8:22 am
Posts: 3430
RichardAndLiz wrote:
So what happens when it does go down 10%? Arent more people going to want to buy now that its cheaper and thus increase demand on that cheaper house and create a bidding war pushing the price back up at least 10%?

Only way I can see prices going down is if the GTA starts losing people like in Detroit. Can you give me an example on how this may happen?

I just dont see the GTA going down in population.


Do you remember the last housing crash we had? Short lived & as soon as it was over new record high prices.

That's why paranoia over bubbles is just paranoia. In long haul prices keep going up and there is no way a home next year is ever go to be long term cheaper than a home decades ago.

Too many external factors.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 04, 2011 9:03 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 4:10 pm
Posts: 813
shawnrk1 wrote:
RichardAndLiz wrote:
So what happens when it does go down 10%? Arent more people going to want to buy now that its cheaper and thus increase demand on that cheaper house and create a bidding war pushing the price back up at least 10%?

Only way I can see prices going down is if the GTA starts losing people like in Detroit. Can you give me an example on how this may happen?

I just dont see the GTA going down in population.


Do you remember the last housing crash we had? Short lived & as soon as it was over new record high prices.

That's why paranoia over bubbles is just paranoia. In long haul prices keep going up and there is no way a home next year is ever go to be long term cheaper than a home decades ago.

Too many external factors.


This was because paranoia hit over the US situation -- everyone retracted. Builders halted new construction, people living on the edge listed their homes quickly etc. Quickly, Canadians realized that although we were very affected, we weren't nearly in the same situation. Quickly people looked to themselves and said "hey, I still have my job! It's not going anywhere anytime soon" to which caused them to quickly say "hey, look at the prices of these houses.. and look how cheap mortgage money is now! It's a great time to get into the market/upsize/downsize" etc.

So the market came back furiously. Add to that many fence sitters were forced to buy sooner rather than later to blanket them against the coming HST implementation which would mean a more expensive house.

Low interest. Less taxes. Cheaper prices. = strong market.

Then what happened in the new build segment was that many builders had hit the panic button and halted production which actually left a bit of a shortage on new homes right at the point the market was running full tilt which lent to less supply vs. higher demand.

The same thing is happening again right now as builders have dropped new home starts in anticipation of the end of the real-estate run up. (Although nobody has told the condo segment this yet). Builders are pretty darn smart.. they work in waves and they know when to cut supply, focus on acquiring new land, commercial development etc. when they feel the real estate demand is decreasing. They wait until the right moment, then unleash the fury once again. By doing this, they ensure a healthy market and top profits for themselves. It makes no sense to whack out hundreds of thousands of units only to sell them for 5% profit.

Unfortunately in the United States, this didn't happen as there was an endless supply of people with signed mortgage papers in hand thanks to the greed of the many banks and private lending institutions. If your a builder and there are lineups of people offering you 20-30-40% profit on your builds with bank approval, you aren't going to turn them down. Unfortunately, now those builders are likely in for a very long time without growth as the massive amount of over supply is taken care of (if that's even possible).

_________________

Looking for something to do today?
Day Trips Canada - http://www.day-trips.ca


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 05, 2011 12:34 pm 
Anyone have a plot with monthly/annual home prices for the past 40 years for the GTA plotted against all of Canada?


Top
  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 05, 2011 2:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 8:22 am
Posts: 3430
Dabills wrote:
what was the last housing crash shawn? 1989 or 2008? i wouldnt call 2008 a crash in the canadian housing market.

Ben does not have any advertising i dont believe, he might now because he updated his site. i am not sure the relevance of that anyway. he is all the stats you are looking for.


2008 was a hiccup exacerbated by the doom sayers


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 05, 2011 2:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 8:22 am
Posts: 3430
rock_80 wrote:
Anyone have a plot with monthly/annual home prices for the past 40 years for the GTA plotted against all of Canada?


Seriously do you really even need this?

There is no plot of land in the GTA that costs less today than 40 years ago (even factoring in the inflation and if the house needs to be demolished on said plot as it was no longer livable)

Many real Canadian stats can be found here:
http://www.cmhc-schl.gc.ca/en/corp/abou ... /index.cfm


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 05, 2011 3:38 pm 
shawnrk1 wrote:
rock_80 wrote:
Anyone have a plot with monthly/annual home prices for the past 40 years for the GTA plotted against all of Canada?


Seriously do you really even need this?

There is no plot of land in the GTA that costs less today than 40 years ago (even factoring in the inflation and if the house needs to be demolished on said plot as it was no longer livable)

Many real Canadian stats can be found here:
http://www.cmhc-schl.gc.ca/en/corp/abou ... /index.cfm


What I would be curious to see is how dips in the overall market in canada , correlated with just the gta dips. I wasnt expecting to see land costs lower now than 40 years ago.


Top
  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 05, 2011 4:59 pm 
Thanks,

I was kinda hoping Ol Skool would chime in with the graph and save me the trouble of looking :P I assume he has all the data to plot it up as part of his research


Top
  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 05, 2011 6:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 8:22 am
Posts: 3430
Dabills wrote:
Hi rock, this primer might have some graphs or links to the ones you are looking for.

http://theeconomicanalyst.com/content/a ... ate-market


There is something wrong with that graph (as it actually contradicts what the CMHC reports). In particular the breakdowns by age are wonky (as the aging baby boomers die off or downsize into condos & retirement homes).

It also contradicts Stats Canada who claim that 2006 had highest % of Canadians owning homes since 1971 (yet on the link you provided 1971 is apparently a very low year)

Quote:
In 2006, Canada's homeownership rate reached its highest level since 1971, according to a new detailed analysis of data on housing, homeownership and shelter costs from the 2006 Census.

At the same time, the percentage of households spending 30% or more of their incomes on shelter, a measurement of housing affordability developed by the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) and the provinces, increased slightly. Most of this increase was for homeowners with mortgages as opposed to renters or mortgage-free owners.

Of the 12.4 million households in Canada, more than 8.5 million, over two-thirds (68.4%) owned their home, the highest rate since 1971. At the same time, the proportion of Canadian households that rented their home slipped from 33.8% in 2001 to 31.2% in 2006. About 3.9 million households rented their home in 2006.

The increase during the five-year period continues the long-term trend in rising homeownership that picked up in 1991 after a period of low growth during the 1980s.

In 2006, an estimated 3.0 million households, or 24.9% of the total, spent 30% or more of their income on shelter, a slight gain from 2001. Among homeowners with mortgages, the proportion was 25.7%, up from 23.6% in 2001. Some of these households may have chosen to spend more than 30% on housing, but the census does not provide information on intentions.

Households in the Atlantic provinces continued to have the highest homeownership rates in the country in 2006. Those in Newfoundland and Labrador had the highest rate, 78.7%. Households in Quebec had the lowest provincial rate at 60.1%.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 05, 2011 7:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2005 9:57 am
Posts: 2204
http://www.canadianbusiness.com/article ... -coal-mine

The party is over! ;)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 12:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2010 8:22 am
Posts: 3430
Dabills wrote:
Not sure, shawn. I have seen that same ownership graph before. Couldn't tell u which one is spot on.


Yeah but you see what I am saying right?

It shows a nearly continuous upward trend in all categories, despite influx of immigration (we are not importing as many 75 year olds as 25 year olds) and says every year higher percent of people own homes (which I disagree with, but if it was true this would mean even a recession or depression or oil shortage had no effect on home ownership whatsoever??? That makes no sense at all...)


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 7:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 4:10 pm
Posts: 813
Dabills wrote:
well statistacally from what i have seen we are at 70% home ownership, for me that doesnt leave much demand left at these prices.

And yes, 2008 and had minimal effect on home ownership in Canada, with loose lending and the CMHC insurance program basically anybody could buy a home. They did.


Many believe between 65-70% is a very healthy home ownership rate for a prosperous country.

Traditionally Canada has run in the 67% range. 70% is a bit high but as you are seeing, prices are up and many are being priced out of the market so that number will slowly come back down over the next few years.

Some countries in Europe are much higher (and probably a reason they are experiencing issues now). For example Ireland is in and around 83%. Hungary is in the 90s.

_________________

Looking for something to do today?
Day Trips Canada - http://www.day-trips.ca


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 3:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 4:10 pm
Posts: 813
Dabills wrote:
Hey DTC,

here is an interesting presentation by Steve Keen. it touches on the population growth etc in relation to house prices.

http://www.debtdeflation.com/blogs/2011 ... sentation/


Interest stuff for sure. The last slide looks very erie! One thing I don't like about the last slide is that it doesn't account for inflation. I've seen the same exact slide going back 50 years but taking inflation into account. In that slide, the 1986-1989 bubble average inflation adjusted price was actually higher than we are now.

Here is one...

Image

So definitely looks like we are heading up that road again, but if you look at the trend line, it doesn't look like we've gone too far up yet. Looks like $375k-$400k seems to be about the right average price for right now. So I think the average of $446k or so is high.

_________________

Looking for something to do today?
Day Trips Canada - http://www.day-trips.ca


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 3:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 4:10 pm
Posts: 813
Dabills wrote:
yeah, it wont be the end of the world. Just gotta get through it, its necessary for the growth we will need on the other side.

Yeah and in 1989 we had a 25% correction or so, no idea what will happen this time in terms of numbers.

BMO released report today too, its in the globe.


But even at 25%, wouldn't that only remove the gains made over the past 3 years? So someone who purchased before say 2008 would still be better off purchasing then than now?

_________________

Looking for something to do today?
Day Trips Canada - http://www.day-trips.ca


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 1889 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 ... 126  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.023s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]