As they themselves clearly admit, the standard "conservative/republican/right wing" gameplan is to first get people comfortable with their government, then reduce income to the government, in a permanent way if possible, to starve the beast. Then, once that is done, since people don't want to pay higher taxes, even if it's just a reversion to what they were paying before, they are able to get support for spending cuts that otherwise would be unsellable.
This is how the Harper government, for example, is playing a very successful long game. In their case it's not just the tax decreases, but the TFSA and it's growing effect over time that will starve the beast.
I suspect Rob Ford's key problem is that he didn't wait for people to become comfortable with his government before jumping to the next step, and he didn't approach it as starving the beast because he kept floating all kinds of spending on things that aren't a priority with the electorate (like Ferris wheels). Between those two things he lost support from the centrists AND the purist conservatives so couldn't make the unsellable spending cuts sellable. Plus, he kind of screwed up his cutting of taxes to starve the beast by then running to another level of government and asking for money.
I'm sure the handlers are waiting to swoop in out of the wings and pull him back on course, and I think you'll find he'll be a little closer to gameplan by the end of his term. And I wouldn't be surprised to see they had privatized garbage and sold the zoo by then... although I doubt you'll see many library closures
Keep in mind, that's just my guess based on how the conservative movement has lately been playing the long game and I'm assuming they will step in. If they leave him to keep putting his foot in it, the whole council might move against him and make him fairly irrelevant. He really does seem to be confused with how much power he actually does yield... after all, he's the f****** mayor, bitches!
