dillon wrote:
What do you base this on? I'll go with common sense - when people know you have unmarked police cars driving around enforcing traffic laws, it makes sense that it creates a general deterrent effect.
That's a sure sign of a police state. We live in a free country, and unmarked police shouldn't be acting covertly against the general population.
dillon wrote:
Thing is, I don't think those people wear t-shirts identifying themselves though, so i guess the police figure they'll start with all the drivers who break the basic traffic laws and go from there. And if they see someone breaking a real "dangerous" one, then bonus! They'll probably give that guy or girl a ticket too.
Many of the laws are asinine, and those tend to be the ones enforced the most heavily.
dillon wrote:
I'd rather they ticket all the "good drivers" breaking the "minor" traffic laws in the meantime, while waiting for that dangerous guy. I mean it's better than sitting around doing nothing, right?
That's a completely ridiculous line of reasoning.
dillon wrote:
And in the meantime, I'll make sure I don't break any minor traffic laws so i don't get a pesky ticket. And if i do break one and get a ticket, I'll feel stupid, I'll suck it up, and I'll realize that i knew the rules, I took a chance or was careless, and now I'll face the consequence. I won't call it a cash grab or say I'm an awesome driver and they should know that and leave me alone and go pick on my neighbour or someone else instead.
So that's what you'll say/think even if whatever you did wasn't unsafe, or perhaps wasn't even exactly what the police allege?